Showing posts with label theatre. Show all posts
Showing posts with label theatre. Show all posts

Wednesday, 8 September 2010

Have you seen Warhorse yet?

If the answer is no, and you live in or near London*, this is what you need to do:

Put this blog down NOW and go and find a credit or debit card.  (Preferably your own, but if for some reason you can't find one of your own, then, well, .......... needs must and all that.  Not that I'm not condoning petty larceny or anything.)  Got one? Good. Now, here's the box-office website;  click that link, and book yourself a ticket. RIGHT NOW.  If you are the kind of person who gets a bit squeamish about going to the theatre on your own, then book two tickets; you can worry about finding someone to come with you later. Hey, I'll even come if you like.  Just GO AND BOOK  NOW. (I'd pay that little bit extra and sit in the stalls, if I were you. But I'll let you decide that for yourself: I don't want to be too militant.  Just GO AND BOOK YOUR TICKET(S) NOW.)
 
Done?  Have you checked your email for confirmation details? Written down the booking reference somewhere nice and safe? Excellent.  You may resume reading.

I am not normally this bossy.  In fact, in real life, I'm not bossy at all. (Occasionally guilty of employing passive-aggressive manipulation techniques to get my own way, if the occasion calls for it, but definitely not bossy.  Ask anyone.)  But I saw Warhorse recently (no, really? I hear you ask) and loved loved loved loved loved it. In fact, I would even go as far as to say that Warhorse is quite simply


The. Best. Theatre. Experience. I. Have. Ever. Had.

I don't use those words (or those full-stops) lightly.  They come from someone who saw Luke Perry's bare bum in the stage production of When Harry Met Sally. Twice.**

Seriously, though, I do see a reasonable amount of theatre, and not all of it features ex-members of the 90210 cast getting their kit off, and I can't remember the last time a production blew me away as much as Warhorse did.  I took my Mum, and she loved it too.

It is phenomonally good, for all kinds of reasons: of course there's the terrific story, which is based on the book by Michael Morpurgo, so its brilliance is almost a given.    I raced out and bought a copy the next day (also Farm Boy, which is the sequel) but haven't had a chance to read it yet so I'm not sure how much of the dialogue came from the original text and how much of it was made up by Nick Stafford, who wrote the stage adaptation.  What I can say is the language used is beautiful and powerful and evocative. Phrases like "shooting their bullets into our bones" have been haunting me for days.

Technically it's brilliant; the set is very simple but is brought to life by clever lighting, audiovisual projections and sounds.  Attention to detail was really impressive; tiny, subtle touches - the sound of seagulls in thre distance, for instance - added volumes to the tone and atmosphere in the room.

Then, of course, there are the animals.  You might have heard the rumours; there are some horses in Warhorse. (They go to war.)  You might also have heard the rumours that there aren't any actual horses on the stage - just pretend, puppet ones.




They don't look anything like that.  But I imagine that the above, or something similar, is what most people conjure up when they imagine horse puppets. The ones on stage, though, were absolutely nothing like this; they were incredibly constructed and creatively engineered, and most importantly they were completely and utterly convicing.  The people operating them, who were visible on the stage but barely noticeable, managed to capture even the slightest moves; a tiny shift of the ears, a twitch of skin, the rise and fall of each breath.   Again, it was the attention to detail which was astounding; more than once I had to remind myself that these weren't living, breathing, creatures on the stage.

There were other animals, too: a comedy goose practically stole the show*** in the first half, adding some welcome light relief, while later, during battle scenes, black crows pecked at the bodies of dying soldiers and horses.  It was a small but brutal addition; the added poignancy struck deeply.

Once you have seen it (what do you MEAN you haven't booked?  Do you not listen?! DO IT NOW for goodness sake) you will be in good company.  As you may have heard, Steven Spielberg saw the production a while ago, and is now working on a film version.  I'm a bit worried about this; I simply can't see how it will work as a film.  As I watched these creatures on stage and witnessed the actors interact with them I found myself falling just as much in love with them as the characters did.  This caused a complete cognitive dissonance; on the one hand I could see with my own eyes that these were just constructions of wood, metal and plastic, being propelled around the stage by humans, but on the other my brain simply refused to process that fact. As far as I was concerned those horses were real, even though I knew they couldn't possibly be. It was nothing short of pure magic.  I'm not convinced that magic won't be lost on screen, but I really, really, hope I'm wrong.






*If you are not in or near London, find a way to get yourself to somewhere which is in or near London, and then follow these instructions.

**I appreciate that this comparison will mean more to some readers than others

***I typed that as "stole the shoe" by mistake, initially; which made me think: there's a phrase which is just crying out to be used as a euphemism. For what, though, I have absolutely no idea.  Answers on a postcard, please.

Thursday, 8 July 2010

Lilies on the Land

I went and saw this last night.  It's a beautiful piece of theatre based on the memories of Land Girls; members of the Women's Land Army who worked on farms during the second world war.

The Lions part theatre company, who devised the production, initially interviewed more than 150 ex-land girls and have used their recollections as source material.  This lends an incredible sense of authenticity; the stories - from earliest thoughts about signing up and the excitement of uniforms arriving by post, to encounters with prisoners of war, tractor driving lessons and coping with outdoor toilet facilities - ring true.  It's a small production; there are only four cast members and the set is simple. But this is all that is needed.  The cycle of the seasons provides a natural structure, and against this backdrop the four main characters tell their stories of farm life with a mix of courage, laughter, sadness, and hope. 

It's only on for another week or so, and doesn't seem to have garnered a huge amount of publicity during its limited run, which is a real shame, and absolutely no reflection on the quality of the performances or the production.  Our dress circle seats were upgraded to stalls, and even those weren't full, so I imagine it would be fairly easy to get hold of tickets. 

The only slight drawback last night was that the London Arts Theatre is right next to a Spanish bar, and a particularly poignant moment in the second half coincided perfectly with Spain's World Cup victory. If you do decide to go, and I definitely think you should, I wouldn't do it on Sunday.

Sunday, 25 April 2010

Guilty Pleasures

We all have them, and one of mine is Elaine Page's Sunday afternoon slot on Radio 2.*  I switched on today just in time to hear the second half of Try to Remember, which is one of those songs I always forget about until I hear it and remember how great it is.  (Best lyric: "without a hurt, the heart is hollow").


There's a few different versions floating around on Youtube: this one is Jerry Orbach, who was a Broadway legend long before he became Lennie Briscoe, and who was first to sing it on stage.





 The song comes from a musical called The Fantasticks (yes, with a k) which is coming to London in June, something I have only just this minute discovered, and am beyond excited about. 

*Also: Starbucks, Dawson's Creek, toasted bacon and egg sandwiches and the earlier works of Neil Diamond.   You?